FocusInterdisciplinary study of cognition across all learning/thinking entities
- Knowledge is … scope of possible action and interpretation
- Knowing is … maintaining fitness (with situation)
- Learner is … any self-modifying and situationally coupled unity (cognizing unity)
- Learning is … adapting
- Teaching is … triggering adaptations
SynopsisCognitive Science is the study of cognition in humans, non-human animals, and machines. Oriented by the conviction that cognition cannot be understood by studying a single level, Cognitive Science brings together psychology, linguistics, computer science, neuroscience, anthropology, philosophy, and other domains. Typically, the foci of Cognitive Science are identified as learning, development, perception, attention, reasoning, emotion, consciousness, memory, language, creativity, and intelligence, and the goals of Cognitive Science are identified as better understanding the mind, advancing practical knowledge of learning, and developing intelligent devices. Associated discourses and constructs that share Cognitive Science's commitment to transdisciplinarity include:
- Cognitive Anthropology – a domain concerned with the implicit knowledge and other non-conscious habits of association that define and distinguish the perceptions of and relations within cultural groups. In addition to Cognitive Science, Cognitive Anthropology draws on history, sociology, anthropology, archaeology, musicology, and other domains.
- Cultural Cognition – a specifical focus of Cognitive Anthropology, Cultural Cognition refers to the tendency to align one’s beliefs with claims that are consistent with one’s cultural identity, but that are contentious and, often, dangerous (e.g., regarding vaccines, gun ownership, environmental risks)
CommentaryWith regard to learning, Cognitive Science sets the gold standards at the moment on matters of both understanding the phenomenon and interdisciplinary research methodologies. Even so, and perhaps owing in part to the divergent perspectives represented in its constituent domains, its discourse is riddled with inconsistent themes and problematic notions. For example, some descriptions of the field focus on “mind” and human cognition, while others (as indicated above) project cognition as a much broader phenomenon. Further, it’s not unusual to come across assertions rooted in Representationalism, Cognitivism, and/or other debunked or limited-scientific models (e.g., asserting that learning is about acquiring, representing, processing, and performing other computational procedures on information).
Authors and/or Prominent InfluencesChristopher Longuet-Higgins Daniel Dennett
Status as a Theory of LearningCognitive Science actually comprises several theories of learning. It is perhaps better understood in terms of the study of learning.
Status as a Theory of TeachingCognitive Science is not a theory of teaching, but its conclusions have served as the foundations of many sound (e.g., Neuroeducation) and not-so-sound (e.g., Brain-Based Learning) offerings.
Status as a Scientific TheoryCognitive Science is a rigorously scientific domain, spanning a broad range of methodologies.
- Cognitive Anthropology
- Cultural Cognition
Please cite this article as:
Davis, B., & Francis, K. (2020). “Cognitive Science” in Discourses on Learning in Education. https://learningdiscourses.com.
⇦ Back to Map
⇦ Back to List