Generational Change Theory
FocusIdentifying and drawing consequential distinctions among generations
- Knowledge is … temporally and culturally distinct mode of being
- Knowing is … embodying generationally specific traits
- Learner is … a generational representative
- Learning is … acculturating
- Teaching is … n/a (largely irrelevant)
OriginatedAncient, but only within the last century as a popular discourse
SynopsisGenerational Theory addresses differences across generations. It comprises discourses that range from the academic-and-grounded to the popular-but-unfounded. Among the former, matters of evolving political, technological, and environmental conditions figure prominently, highlighting the co-evolution of humanity’s circumstances and cultural sensibilities. Among the latter, intergenerational differences are often exaggerated and indexed more to decades of birth than to evolving circumstances. Across both cases, significant implications for education are posited as consequential differences in learner attitude and behavior are named.
Academic Treatments of Generational Theory
- Pulse-Rate Hypothesis (Hans Jaeger, 1980s) – the notion that a population can be parsed into a sequence of discrete cohorts, each with a distinct identity linked to the timing of the formative years (typically: ages 0–12). Examples include:
- Strauss–Howe Generational Theory (Fourth Turning Theory) (William Strauss & Neil Howe, 1990s) – an argument that history unfolds according to recurring generational archetypes, based on analyses of American and global history
- Impulse Hypothesis (Hans Jaeger, 1980s) – the notion that perceptual distinctions arise among generations as specific historical events compel younger people to perceive the world and engage differently from their elders. Examples include:
- Theory of Generations (Sociology of Generations) (Karl Mannheim, 1920s) – defining a “generation” in terms of individuals who have all experienced a historical event that is associated with significant social and/or cultural transformation
Popular Treatments of Generational TheoryOverwhelmingly, popular discourse on generations difference is more reflective of the Pulse-Rate Hypothesis than the Impulse Hypothesis – but the notions are blended in the most popular model, which combines acknowledgments of major historical events with a more-recent tendency toward demarcations based on steady 15–20-year intervals. While other models have been developed that are specific to various populations, the most commonly invoked in the modern, western context includes the following generations:
- Lost Generation (coined by Ernest Hemingway, 1920s) – born early 1880s–1900, entering adulthood during World War I, followed by the Spanish Flu Epidemic, and then by the “Roaring Twenties.” The name is a reference to the disorientation of persons and peoples across these tumultuous times in global politics and national culture.
- Greatest Generation (G.I. Generation) (term popularized by Tom Brokaw, 1990s) – born 1901–1927, and defined according to the age of most soldiers in World War II
- Silent Generation (Lucky Few Generation) – born 1928–1945, this cohort came of age during a relatively peaceful era (compared to previous generations) and was is associated with rapid growth in prosperity in the western world
- Baby Boomers (Me Generation) – born 1946–1964, in a significant baby boom following World War II, noted for taking advantage of post-world-war prosperity, for intense self-interest, and for mounting opposition to oppressive and biased policies and structures, came to age prior to the digital revolution
- Generation Jones (coined by Jonathan Pontell, 2000s) – microgeneration born 1956–1965, during a period of continuing economic boom and high birth rates. Owing to a prosperous childhood in the 1960s and an austere adolescence in the 1970s, members are characterized as pragmatic, hardworking, adaptable, and inventive. The term is derived from a phrase popular in the 1970s, “Keeping up with the Joneses,” which is suggested to be reflective of Generation Jones desires for grander possessions and experiences.
- Generation X (Gen X; Latchkey Generation; MTV Generation; Baby Bust Generation) – born 1965–1980, associated with a drop in birth rates after the post-war baby boom and with formative years when digital technologies were proliferating, noted for comfort with and savvy around technology
- Xennials (Oregon Trail Generation, which is named after an educational video game) –microgeneration born mid-1970s–mid-1980s, experiencing an “analog childhood” and a “digital young adulthood” – thus situated differently in relation to digital technologies than both Generation X and Millennials, yet sharing qualities with both.
- Millennials (Generation Y; Gen Y; Gen Me; Gen We; Echo Boomers) – born 1981–1994/96, the first Digital Natives (see below) who grew up around mobile devices and the Internet, noted for heightened awareness of collectivity and for whom social media figures centrally in relationships, whose preferences for entertainment shift from television to streaming services. A proposed subset of Millennials is:
Geriatric Millennials (Erica Dhawan, 2020s) – Millennials born in the early 1980s, who were the first born into homes with personal computers. The suggestion is that they are uniquely comfortable with both analog and digital technologies.
- Generation Z (Gen Z, iGeneration, Post-Millennials, Homeland Generation; Zoomers) – born 1997–early-2010s, who have always been immersed in a hyper-connected social world and for whom online-activity is a major and integrated aspect of existence. Associated terms include:
- TikTok Generation – a term sometimes associated with Generation Z, prompted by claims in the early 2020s that over half this group used the app and, conversely, more than half the app users came from the group
- Zombie Generation (P. Chevyetski, 2010s) – a play on the “Z” of Generation Z, intended to characterize a large portion of this generation as technology-addicted zombies
- Generation Alpha (Gen Alpha) – born from the early-2010s through the mid-to-late 2020s, and so not yet associated with any essentialized markers
- Next-Gens – a relative term, referring to the “next generation” – i.e., the one that succeeded or will succeed the generation under discussion
Subdiscourses and Constructs Associated with Generational TheoryA number of notions relevant to formal education have arisen alongside Generational Theory:
- Digital Divide (1990s) – a descriptive device invoked in comparisons of groups who have access to and benefit to digital technologies and those who do not
- Digital Immigrants (Marc Prensky, 2000s) – descriptor applied to one whosesignificant encounters with digital technologies began after the formative years (contrast: Digital Natives)
- Digital Natives (Marc Prensky, 2000s) – descriptor applied to one who has been immersed in digital technologies from birth (contrast: Digital Immigrants)
- Generation Gap (Generational Gap) – a catch-all construct, originally applied to in the 1960s to label perceived differences between Baby Boomers and the Silent Generation, currently generalized to refer to any perceived differences in beliefs, values, preferences, lifestyles, and imagined necessities between two age groups
- Generationism – the conviction that one generation is better than another
- Intergenerationality (Inter-Generational Contract) – the interactions between generations, typically examined through lenses of conflict, privilege, and power
- Transgenerational Design (James Pirkl, 1980s) – consistent with Learning Design, and highly resonant with Universal Design for Learning, this discourse focuses on products and contexts that can accommodate the widest possible range of consumers, especially across age groups
CommentaryCommentators tend to agree that there is obvious educational value in attending to cultural evolutions that contribute both to the emergence of different sorts of learners and to needs for different sorts of learnings. However, in the tendencies to rely on arbitrary dates, to allow major events to eclipse the significance of subtle-but-ongoing evolutions, to essentialize generational characteristics, and to deploy those qualities as explanatory principles, commentators argue that Generational Theory risks overstepping its reach and, in consequence, may be simultaneously highlighting anachronistic aspects of formal education while failing to offer any meaningful advice on ameliorating the situation.
Authors and/or Prominent InfluencesExtremely diffuse
Status as a Theory of LearningGenerational Theory is a not a theory of learning, but it could be described as “discourse on learners,” as various associated notions are invoked with some frequency in discussions of changing demographics, teacher frustration with students, and other evolving issues in education.
Status as a Theory of TeachingGenerational Theory is not a theory of teaching, but it has been deployed as a bases for critiques of traditional and contemporary teaching practices.
Status as a Scientific TheoryMost contemporary versions of Generational Theory are more popular than scientific in nature. It is easily demonstrated that they are prompted by and pointing to important phenomena, but few aspects of Generational Theory do so in a manner that approaches the standards of scientific inquiry.
- Baby Boomers (Me Generation)
- Digital Divide
- Digital Immigrants
- Digital Natives
- Generation Alpha (Gen Alpha)
- Generation Gap (Generational Gap)
- Generation Jones
- Generation X (Gen X; Latchkey Generation; MTV Generation; Baby Bust Generation)
- Generation Z (Gen Z, iGeneration, Post-Millennials, Homeland Generation; Zoomers)
- Geriatric Millennials
- Greatest Generation (G.I. Generation)
- Impulse Hypothesis (Hans Jaeger, 1980s)
- Intergenerationality (Inter-Generational Contract)
- Lost Generation
- Millennials (Generation Y; Gen Y; Gen Me; Gen We; Echo Boomers)
- Pulse-Rate Hypothesis
- Silent Generation (Lucky Few Generation)
- Strauss–Howe Generational Theory (Fourth Turning Theory)
- Theory of Generations (Sociology of Generations)
- TikTok Generation
- Transgenerational Design
- Xennials (Oregon Trail Generation)
- Zombie Generation
Please cite this article as:
Davis, B., & Francis, K. (2023). “Generational Theory” in Discourses on Learning in Education. https://learningdiscourses.com.
⇦ Back to Map
⇦ Back to List