- Knowledge is … sum of collectively established construals/constructions
- Knowing is … evolving webs of coherent interpretations; fitness with circumstances
- Learner is … a meaning-maker (individual)
- Learning is … adapting (construing*, connecting, interpreting, weaving)
- Teaching is … occasioning, prompting, triggering, listening
SynopsisGenetic Epistemology is Jean Piaget’s theory of the genesis/origin of knowing/epistemology. Critical of efforts to explain cognition in terms of Newtonian mechanics, and greatly influenced by Darwinian evolutionary theory, in Piaget’s Genetic Epistemology ideas are understood to evolve in relationship to and interaction with others in an ecosystem of notions. Learning is thus framed as an adaptive process in which the principal criteria of personal truth are coherence among elements of understanding and their utility for making sense of one’s own experience, not match between internal models and external reality or subjective interpretation and objective fact. To this point, one of Piaget’s major contributions was using the metaphor of “adaptation” (from evolutionary theory) to describe learning. He saw learning-as-adaptation as involving a trigger and two main sub-processes:
- Disequilibrium (Cognitive Disequilibrium) – a metaphor introduced by Piaget to refer to the experience of unsettledness or inconsistency that triggers the emergence or modification of a schema
- Assimilation – applying prior learnings to new information (e.g., referring to all farm buildings as “houses”), and so learning with no modification to a schema
- Accommodation – revising prior learnings to deal with new information (e.g., upon learning that non-human animals live in barns and wheat is stored in granaries, distinguishing among “farm buildings”), and so significantly modifying a schema
- Piaget's Model of Cognitive Development (Jean Piaget and Barbel Inhelder, 1940s) – a model that tracks development from birth to late adolescence through Sensorimotor, Preoperational, Concrete Operational, and Formal Operational periods.
- Piagetian Programs – a phrase used to distinguish teaching methods and classroom structures that are informed by Piaget’s Genetic Epistemology and Piaget's Model of Cognitive Development (see above).
CommentaryGenetic Epistemology is often criticized as either ignoring or being oblivious to situational (i.e., social, cultural, technical, etc.) considerations – accusations that serve as immediate evidence that the critic has not actually read Piaget’s work. In fact, Piaget was highly attentive to such matters, but maintained a clear focus on individual sense-making in his research. Closely related to this unfounded criticism, many commentators contend that Genetic Epistemology is incompatible with Socio-Cultural Theory and other perspectives focused on collective elements of cognition. While discrepancies certainly exist, they are hardly insurmountable – and are perhaps better entertained as indications of the complexity of cognition rather than evidence Piaget was “limited” or “wrong.”
Authors and/or Prominent InfluencesJean Piaget; Barbel Inhelder
Status as a Theory of LearningGenetic Epistemology is a theory of learning. In contrast to Behaviorisms and other perspectives that arose in the first half of the 20th century, Genetic Epistemology was among the first theoretical offerings to offer clear and critical commentaries of its own assumptions and metaphors.
Status as a Theory of TeachingGenetic Epistemology is not a theory of teaching. As with its near relative, Radical Constructivism, a core tenet is that it cannot tell teachers what do to, since there is no cause–effect relationship between a teacher’s actions and a learner’s construals. That said, Genetic Epistemology has been the source of a great deal of useful advice. (See Radical Constructivism and Cognitive Developmentalisms.)
Status as a Scientific TheoryGenetic Epistemology was among the first theories of learning in which the meaning of “learning” was actually interrogated. Piaget’s bold move into evolutionary notions not only afforded a powerful metaphor for learning, it also revealed the ubiquity of naïve and indefensible metaphors – not just in popular Folk Theories but across Behaviorisms and other efforts to scientize the study of cognition. A substantial evidence base has since been assembled.
- Piaget’s Model of Cognitive Development
- Piagetian Program
Please cite this article as:
Davis, B., & Francis, K. (2021). “Genetic Epistemology” in Discourses on Learning in Education. https://learningdiscourses.com.
⇦ Back to Map
⇦ Back to List