FocusRelationship between engagement and one’s self-belief
Principal MetaphorsSelf-Efficacy is not aligned with a particular theory of learning, which means that almost any theory of learning can be aligned with it. That said, the metaphors and images most often invoked fit most closely with the Attainment Metaphor …
- Knowledge is … a territory/area/domain/field (typically involving challenge)
- Knowing is … attaining a goal
- Learner is … a seeker (individual)
- Learning is … journeying (arriving at, reaching, progressing, accomplishing, achieving)
- Teaching is … leading, guiding, directing, facilitating
SynopsisSelf-Efficacy addresses self-confidence and self-awareness. Concisely, Self-Efficacy has to do with one’s belief in one’s capacities to meet challenges and reach goals. High Self-Efficacy is linked to effort, strategizing, persistence, and resilience on tasks, as well as more flexible and global views of challenges and greater ownership of both successes and failures. Low Self-Efficacy manifests as over-estimating task difficulty, sometimes-unpredictable behavior while engaged in tasks, and tendencies to link both successes and failures to luck or others. Research in Self-Efficacy is focused on models and scales that are used to distinguish contributing factors (e.g., experiential, psychological, physiological, relational, and environmental), define paths of development, identify dynamics, and assess educational interventions. Precursors to Self-Efficacy include:
- Voluntarism (Wilhelm Wundt, late 1800s) – an attempt to systematically study human mind and human will by observing cultural behaviors, aimed at identifying the basic elements of consciousness
- Reciprocal Determinism (Albert Bandura, 1980s) – the principle that there is a reciprocal, co-determining relationship one’s thoughts and actions and one’s context
CommentaryOn some levels, Self-Efficacy amounts to common sense – a formalization of the old saw, “Whether you think you can, or you think you can’t – you’re right” (attributed to Henry Ford). Some critics thus argue that its surrounding research is circular and uninformative, in that it is no surprise that strong self-efficacy contributes to greater success, which contributes to stronger self-efficacy … and so on. Additionally, there is a pronounced (but not universal) tendency of proponents to use the word innate when referring to personal abilities and traits, summoning long-debunked Nativism assumptions.
Authors and/or Prominent InfluencesAlbert Bandura
Status as a Theory of LearningSelf-Efficacy is not a theory of learning.
Status as a Theory of TeachingSelf-Efficacy is a theory on factors that influence learning. A major focus of Self-Efficacy research has been to offer teachers strategies to promote relevant attitudes, awarenesses, and beliefs in their students – and so, on those counts, Self-Efficacy could be described as a theory of teaching.
Status as a Scientific TheoryThere is ample and robust evidence to support the sub-constructs of Self-Efficacy. However, as relevant to the criticisms noted above, it is not clear that the construct itself is well-conceived or rigorously understood.
- Reciprocal Determinism
Please cite this article as:
Davis, B., & Francis, K. (2021). “Self-Efficacy” in Discourses on Learning in Education. https://learningdiscourses.com.
⇦ Back to Map
⇦ Back to List