Social and Emotional Learning
FocusReciprocal effects of well-being and academic learning
- Knowledge is … repertoire of actions
- Knowing is … well-adjusted acting
- Learner is … a social being
- Learning is … rehearsing appropriate (re)actions
- Teaching is … coaching
SynopsisSocial-Emotional Learning is defined in a number of ways, but most often highlights the intertwinings of one’s ability to monitor and manage emotions, the health of one’s social relationships, and the soundness of one’s academic learning. Proponents typically assert positive reciprocal influences among attitudes, academic performance, behavior, and emotions, leading to advice on coaching on social and emotional skills. A prominent subdiscourse is:
- Companionable Learning (Romary Roberts, 2000s) – advice on environments and relationships for well-being development of very young children (ages 0 to 3 years)
- Peace Learning Circles (formerly: Tribes Learning Communities) (Jeanne Gibbs, 1970s) – a commercial venture, selling a program based on Social-Emotional Learning aimed at K–12 levels, as well as training for educators in implementing that program
- Trauma-Informed Learning (2010s) – Prompted by recent research on extents of childhood trauma and amplified by more-and-more urgent discussions of social and environmental crises, Trauma-Informed Learning focuses on strategies to make schools safe and restorative sites for all learners.
CommentarySocial-Emotional Learning appears to be more a domain of discussion than a well-defined discourse. While it is supported by some research evidence, most discussions of the matter seem to be oriented more by common sense than empirical studies, reflecting age-old maxims that link happiness, healthiness, and productivity, coupled to reminders of the value of caring, respectful, and safe learning environments. Consequently, the discourse might be best seen as a timely mash-up of other, more focused discourses that address aspects of learner well-being.
Authors and/or Prominent InfluencesDiffuse
Status as a Theory of LearningSocial-Emotional Learning ties into the realization that humans are embodied beings – which is to say, it is founded on the premise that the social, emotional, physical, and cognitive are integrated and inseparable elements of one’s being. That said, while it relies on this point, it doesn’t not develop it, and so Social-Emotional Learning cannot be properly described as a theory of learning.
Status as a Theory of TeachingAlmost all treatments of Social-Emotional Learning are concerned with offering pragmatic advice for teachers and educational learners. It is thus perhaps best described as a theory of teaching.
Status as a Scientific TheoryProponents of Social-Emotional Learning often cite empirical research that shows the positive correlations among aspects of well-being and academic performance. For the most part, that research appears to be associated with other discourses on learning – and so, while the claims are not wrong, the fact that supporting evidence is not specific to Social-Emotional Learning makes it something of a stretch to argue that this mash-up of discourses is fully scientific.
- Companionable Learning
- Peace Learning Circles (formerly: Tribes Learning Communities)
- Trauma-Informed Learning
Please cite this article as:
Davis, B., & Francis, K. (2021). “Social-Emotional Learning” in Discourses on Learning in Education. https://learningdiscourses.com.
⇦ Back to Map
⇦ Back to List