FocusSelf-maintenance of life on Earth
- Knowledge is … summed activity of the planetary system
- Knowing is … self-maintenance
- Learner is … the planet (a complex, dynamic system)
- Learning is … evolving and emerging
- Teaching is … systemic feedback
SynopsisAuthors of the Gaia Hypothesis propose that the interactions of living organisms and their inorganic environments on Earth form a complex (emergent, self-regulating, evolving) system. Importantly, “Gaia” is not seen as an organism, but the system of “organic co-evolving with/in inorganic” – and that system is posited to maintain the conditions for life.
CommentaryMany criticisms of the Gaia Hypothesis are focused on early versions (e.g., those that accuse it of being teleological), misconstruals (e.g., those that accuse it of describing the planet as an organism or a neo-Pagan religion), or inappropriate expectations (e.g., demands for explanations of “mechanisms” – a reductionist notion rooted in physics). Most of these concerns have been addressed in current versions of the Gaia Hypothesis. Indeed, most are answered through nuanced explications of complex systems (see Eco-Complexity Discourses). One persistent and resilient focus of criticism is that the Gaia Hypothesis doesn’t offer a comprehensive account of what it is claimed to explain.
Authors and/or Prominent InfluencesJames Lovelock; Lynn Margulis
Status as a Theory of LearningWithin the frame of Eco-Complexity Discourses, learning is understood in terms of ongoing adaptations/evolutions that enable a system to maintain its dynamic coherence within its similarly dynamic circumstances. In that sense, the Gaia Hypothesis is a theory of learning – and humans (individual, communities, the species) are a component of the learning system it describes.
Status as a Theory of TeachingThe Gaia Hypothesis is not a theory of teaching – insofar as “teaching” is understood in causal terms. It does, however, afford important insights into how the activities and traits of each component of a system are always and already contributing to the system’s viability. It might be argued that this knowledge should compel all conscious and sufficiently intelligent agents to consider their own roles in “teaching” – i.e., affecting the viability of – the system.
Status as a Scientific TheoryWhile the Gaia Hypothesis continues to have its detractors, it also has an impressive base of supporters. Because the theory cannot be directly tested, its empirical grounding comprises computer-based complex modeling and demonstrated utility in predicting and explaining observed phenomena. On those counts, the Gaia Hypothesis meets our criteria of a scientific theory.
Please cite this article as:
Davis, B., & Francis, K. (2020). “Gaia Hypothesis” in Discourses on Learning in Education. https://learningdiscourses.com.
⇦ Back to Map
⇦ Back to List