Transfer of Learning
Transfer of Practice
FocusApplying what was learned in one setting to a different setting
- Knowledge is … scope of possible actions and interpretations
- Knowing is … competence
- Learner is … an extrapolator (individual)
- Learning is … transfer
- Teaching is … cuing
SynopsisLearning Transfer refers to instances of applying what is learned in one setting/task to an identifiably different setting/task. The extent to which it happens depends on such factors as the similarity of the situations, the motivations of the learner, mastery of the content, and prompts and interpretive assistance from a knowledgeable other. Various taxonomies (of types of transfer) and strategies (to encourage transfer) have been developed. Associated constructs and discourses include:
- General Transfer (Transfer by Generalization; Transfer of Principles) – the transfer of learning from one task or situation to a another with very different structures and demands
- Specific Transfer – the transfer of learning from one task or situation to another that is clearly similar
- Identical Elements Theory of Transfer (Edward Thorndike, 1930s) – the postulate that Learning Transfer is likely to be improved when there are more common elements between the learning situation and the transfer context
- Formal Discipline Theory of Transfer (Mental Muscle Approach to Learning) (Thomas Reid, 1700s) – a perspective that rests on the assumption that learning is a matter of exercising and developing specific mental faculties, in a manner analogous to building muscle mass. Consequently, just as exercising specific muscles enables specific skills, it is assumed that exercising specific faculties (e.g., mathematical) enables specific abilities (e.g., reasoning)
CommentarySome contend that it should go without saying that Learning Transfer is desirable outcome of formal education – since the whole point of the enterprise is to equip learners with knowledge and skills that will be useful in other settings. In some ways, then, the emergence and prominence of Learning Transfer in discussions of schooling is an acknowledgment of failed teaching strategies and inadequate theories of learners and learning. An entirely different school of thought is that humans are evolutionarily disposed to not transfer their learning – since, for example, extending one’s understandings of a house cat to a cougar could lead to problems. That is, the big issue may not be teaching strategies, but the notion that formal education is about preparation for adult life and/or the real world.
Authors and/or Prominent InfluencesEdward Thorndike; Robert S. Woodworth
Status as a Theory of LearningLearning Transfer is not a theory of learning.
Status as a Theory of TeachingLearning Transfer is a theory of teaching. It speaks to the emphases, strategies, and intentions that teachers might employ to support learners’ capacities to perceive the relationships between in-class learning and out-of-class experiences.
Status as a Scientific TheoryThere’s abundant evidence that learnings often do not transfer, even in some instances when all of the conditions deemed necessary to support transfer seem to be in place. However, there are no unified theories to account for the extreme diversity among learners that has been observed, nor for informing educators on how to address the phenomenon. Lacking such perspectives, Learning Transfer can be classified as an educational concern, but it cannot be classified a scientific theory.
- Formal Discipline Theory of Transfer (Mental Muscle Approach to Learning)
- General Transfer (Transfer by Generalization; Transfer of Principles)
- Identical Elements Theory of Transfer
- Specific Transfer
Please cite this article as:
Davis, B., & Francis, K. (2021). “Learning Transfer” in Discourses on Learning in Education. https://learningdiscourses.com.
⇦ Back to Map
⇦ Back to List