FocusThe mental activity associated with observable cause–effect, stimulus–response events
- Knowledge is … one’s repertoire of behaviors
- Knowing is … behaving (triggered by stimuli)
- Learner is … an organism
- Learning is … changes in behavior (linking stimuli to responses)
- Teaching is … training; engineering behavior (through deliberate conditioning)
SynopsisMethodological Behaviorism is among the earliest and most prescriptive Behaviorisms. Developed in the early 20th century, it expanded on Classical Conditioning’s emphasis on observing and measuring physical cause and effect. However, unlike Radical Behaviorism, which avoided any consideration of internal mental function, Methodological Behaviorism permitted hypothesizing about cognitive processes as the cause of behaviors. (To be clear, it embraced empirical, observation-based research methods and rejected introspective methods which focused on mental activity.)
CommentarySee Behaviorisms. In addition to those limitations, proponents of Radical Behaviorism regarded Methodological Behaviorism as self-limiting because it allowed consideration of unobservable, unmeasurable mental activity.
Authors and/or Prominent InfluencesIvan Pavlov; John B. Watson
Status as a Theory of LearningMethodological Behaviorism is a theory of learning, with significant contributions to academic understandings of learning. Demonstrated insights include the knowers are coupled to their contexts, that humans have many types of motivation, and that personal insight is more about “knowing” (dynamic, idiosyncratic, context-dependent) than “knowledge” (fixed, universal, context-independent).
Status as a Theory of TeachingWith the assumption of cause–effect relationships between stimuli and responses, Methodological Behaviorism presented immediate prescriptions for how to prompt learners to manifest or suppress particular behaviors. Consequently, although explicitly about learning, Methodological Behaviorism was quickly embraced as a theory of teaching, rising to some dominance among researchers and policy makers by the mid-1900s. Even though it has been shown to be inadequate for making sense of the complexity of human learning, it continues to have a strong presence in curriculum documents, classroom practices, and evaluation schemes.
Status as a Scientific TheoryWith regard to methodology, like most Behaviorisms, Methodological Behaviorism meets the requirements of a scientific inquiry. However, it falls short on matters of critical attentiveness to its central constructs – a point that is evident in its inability to account for phenomena such as human creativity. A further instance is a general inattentiveness to some inherited assumptions about learning and learners.
Please cite this article as:
Davis, B., & Francis, K. (2020). “Methodological Behaviorism” in Discourses on Learning in Education. https://learningdiscourses.com.
⇦ Back to Map
⇦ Back to List