FocusStrategies used to derive or validate insights based on established insights
- Knowledge is … scope of possible interpretation
- Knowing is … considered thought and action
- Learner is … a thinker (individual)
- Learning is … reasoning
- Teaching is … challenging (to think)
OriginatedAncient (entrenched in the language)
SynopsisModes of Reasoning refers to a range of conscious processes used to derive or validate assertions based on established understandings. It is most commonly associated with logical deduction, but humans actually use a range of strategies to generate their truths, including the following:
- Deductive Reasoning (Deductive Logic, Logical Deduction, Top-Down Logic) is a formal process of moving from premises to a logically certain conclusion. Specific rules apply.
- Inductive Reasoning (Bottom-Up Logic) has to do more with expectation than certainty. It occurs when, based on a pattern of events or premises, one anticipates future events or implications.
- Abductive Reasoning (Abduction, Abductive Inference, Retroduction) is explanation oriented, and it is concerned with plausibility rather than certainty. It starts with observations and its process might be described in terms of seeking simple and likely explanations.
- Analogical Reasoning (Analogy) is an interpretation strategy that involves drawing (figurative) associations between a familiar phenomenon (the analog, source, or source domain) and a new phenomenon (the target or target domain). Specific types of Analogical Reasoning include analogies, metaphors, similes, allegories, parables, and exemplification. (See Conceptual Metaphor Theory.)
- Bounded Rationality, associated with Pragmatism, is about making good-enough (vs. optimal) decisions, taking into account such constraints as time pressures, problem complexity, resource availability, and cognitive limitations.
- Probabilistic Thinking is a based on an assumption that the universe obeys the laws of probability. It is thus a model of reasoning and decision-making that, as the name suggests, involves calculating (or reasonably estimating) the likelihoods of identified outcomes to specific actions. Ironically, proponents of Probabilistic Thinking generally concede that, even among the small portion of people capable of calculating (or reasonably estimating) probabilities, just a tiny subset is able to act on those results.
CommentaryThe biggest issue with Modes of Reasoning is that they are notoriously difficult to study – since, to do so, they need to be applied to themselves. A simple fact that should give pause is it has only been recently that humanity has realized that what most defines our thinking capacities is not Deductive Reasoning (which is trivial with computers), but Analogical Reasoning (which is notoriously difficult to simulate). That development might be taken as an indication that there is still much to learn about how humans think.
Authors and/or Prominent InfluencesDiffuse
Status as a Theory of LearningModes of Reasoning are properly understood as theories of learning. Each is a mode of generating and/or confirming new understandings – which is an interpretation of “learning” that fits across most discourses.
Status as a Theory of TeachingModes of Reasoning do not constitute a theory of teaching.
Status as a Scientific TheoryModes of Reasoning are associated with extensive philosophical and empirical research.
- Abductive Reasoning
- Analogical Reasoning
- Bounded Rationality
- Deductive Reasoning
- Inductive Reasoning
- Probabilistic Thinking
Please cite this article as:
Davis, B., & Francis, K. (2020). “Modes of Reasoning” in Discourses on Learning in Education. https://learningdiscourses.com.
⇦ Back to Map
⇦ Back to List