FocusInterpreting phenomena as sums of parts
- Knowledge is … both parts to assemble and assemblages of parts
- Knowing is … acting on assembled truths
- Learner is … an assembler
- Learning is … putting together
- Teaching is … breaking things down
SynopsisReductionism is a descriptive notion that can be applied to any discourse that embraces the premise that an object, agent, event, or any other type of phenomenon can be fully understood in terms of either simpler phenomena or as the sum of its parts. Significantly, most versions of Reductionism embrace tenets of both Empiricism (e.g., emphasizing evidence) and Rationalism (e.g., emphasizing logical coherence). Types of Reductionism include:
- Methodological Reductionism – any approach to study that is oriented by an intention to provide explanations for phenomena in terms of smaller or simpler phenomena
- Objectivism (Ayn Rand, 1940s) – a belief system founded on the assumptions that reality exists independently of one’s consciousness, one’s contact with that reality is mediated by one’s sense perceptions, objective knowledge can be derived from one’s sense perceptions through Inductive Reasoning (see Modes of Reasoning), and art can play a vital role in learning and teaching through physical representations that make specific aspects of reality more available to perception
- Ontological Reductionism – any belief system in which the entirety of reality is seen to consist of different combination of a few specified parts or elements (such as, e.g., earth, fire, air, and water)
- Theory Reductionism – an assertion that new, more expansive and/or powerful theories operate by reducing previous theories to simpler or more basic terms
- Unity of Science – a perspective founded on the conviction that all sciences can be reduced to the laws of physics
- Mechanistic Theory (Mechanical Concept of Mind; Mechanistic Approach; Mechanical-Man Concept) – the notion that human functioning, including consciousness and sociality, can be understood in terms of mechanical processes – that is, that physics is sufficient for making sense of human activity
CommentaryThe major (and condemning) commentaries on reductionism are associated with Emergent Complexity Discourses and Ecological Discourses, which flatly assert the underlying premise of Reductionism is false.
Authors and/or Prominent InfluencesDiffuse
Status as a Theory of LearningWhile usually applied specifically to discussions of knowledge (rather than learning), the assumptions of Reductionism and its subdiscourses are evident in virtually all Correspondence Discourses.
Status as a Theory of TeachingReductionism is not a theory of teaching, but its core premise is pervasively present in modern schooling – and especially evident in Directive Pedagogies.
Status as a Scientific TheoryThe notion that a phenomenon might be understood by reducing it to simpler phenomena was foundational to modern science, and so Reductionism is integral to both Empiricism and Rationalism. However, the realization that some phenomena transcend their parts has exposed Reductionism as an over-applied assumption rather than a defensible principle of scientific study. It is relevant and appropriate to many phenomena, but it is of limited relevance and use in the study of such complex phenomena as learning.
- Mechanistic Theory (Mechanical Concept of Mind; Mechanistic Approach; Mechanical-Man Concept)
- Methodological Reductionism
- Ontological Reductionism
- Theory Reductionism
- Unity of Science
Please cite this article as:
Davis, B., & Francis, K. (2022). “Reductionism” in Discourses on Learning in Education. https://learningdiscourses.com.
⇦ Back to Map
⇦ Back to List